Richard Carl Silk
2024-03-25 20:45:42 UTC
Sorry, readers (if any) - but while the dream was *super-clear* at the time of
dreaming, and *fairly* clear after waking, it's *somewhat* muddled this much
later in the day, but I'll do what I can to repeat it as accurately as possible.
LAST EVENING, late into the night (past midnight) I watched a rather
*questionable* movie: either A) it was a fictionalized account of a TRUE story,
or B) a true representation of a fictional story. Either way, it was *thought
provoking* and to an extent, disturbing, yet entertaining at the same time.
The movie was "Confessions of a Dangerous Mind" (imdb.com/title/tt0270288) - the
"unauthorized autobiography" of Chuck Barris (creator of "The Dating Game," "The
Newlywed Game," and "The Gong Show," being 3 of his best-known works.)
A person would have to "watch" the movie to understand how disturbing yet
entertaining it actually is.
The point being, I'm *fairly certain* that the movie was the "cause" of the
"disturbing dream" I had before waking, around daybreak this morning. The
dreamer was as if caught within a building / structure, wherein there were
people (and things) designed to kill the dreamer, including (but not limited to)
a room where two (adjoining) walls were expanding (inverted!) *into* the room,
sort of like:
? (« where the space available to maneuver became like a very narrow hallway
along the lower- and left-facing walls.)
Somehow the dreamer escaped that room, only to find there were assassins
outside, and those had to be avoided as well. Sorry, but the dream was so
fraught with tension and "drama" that I've pretty much forgotten most of it,
sort of like "good riddance to bad vibes."
Around daybreak, I let the dog out for a few moments, then resumed my "morning
nap on the couch," where I soon had a *very clear* dream / astral experience,
nearly, *as if* a group of intellectually charged "astral entities" (aka "dream
bodies") were in a room, much like a small, college classroom (or advanced high
school something or other):
Also, as to which position the dreamer / narrative mind was "primarily
associated with" in the dream *may* be position of the headmaster of the class
(aka "the teacher") - regardless, this is about how it "unfurled," so to speak:
The instructor of the class, sort of like a lead philosopher / instructor, is
asking the class (as a whole):
"How does one add value to a person?"
The prepositional phrase of "to a person" seemed less important than the core
structure of the question, "How does
one add value...?" (to any living being or objective "thing.")
There was a clear moment of silence in the "classroom" as the students (those
people gathered there) pondered the question.
Someone (*possibly* the dreamer / narrative mind as well!) requested
clarification of the question, using only two words: "Define 'value'-"
The instructor replied directly (as if he'd been expecting the question) "That
which is greater than zero."
At this point, there was perhaps a *somewhat shorter* pause, and I (as the
person posting this dream) am unclear as to whether it was a "correct response"
*given,* or whether the instructor simply answered it for the class, yet
regardless, the answer was (is) accepted as a "correct" or "valid" answer-
"By giving it [or possibly 'him'] a name."
That is, to give a person (especially as a newborn) (or any *thing*) a "name,"
the individual (or "noun") is given "value." That value may *decrease* into a
negative range if the person becomes a "liar," whereas the individual reveals a
"positive value" when sharing / revealing that which is logically TRUE to
others, to the world. A value of "0" typically indicates that which was never
born.
Clarity? I suppose one could say that depends upon the perception of the reader
/ listener / viewer / receiver.
dreaming, and *fairly* clear after waking, it's *somewhat* muddled this much
later in the day, but I'll do what I can to repeat it as accurately as possible.
LAST EVENING, late into the night (past midnight) I watched a rather
*questionable* movie: either A) it was a fictionalized account of a TRUE story,
or B) a true representation of a fictional story. Either way, it was *thought
provoking* and to an extent, disturbing, yet entertaining at the same time.
The movie was "Confessions of a Dangerous Mind" (imdb.com/title/tt0270288) - the
"unauthorized autobiography" of Chuck Barris (creator of "The Dating Game," "The
Newlywed Game," and "The Gong Show," being 3 of his best-known works.)
A person would have to "watch" the movie to understand how disturbing yet
entertaining it actually is.
The point being, I'm *fairly certain* that the movie was the "cause" of the
"disturbing dream" I had before waking, around daybreak this morning. The
dreamer was as if caught within a building / structure, wherein there were
people (and things) designed to kill the dreamer, including (but not limited to)
a room where two (adjoining) walls were expanding (inverted!) *into* the room,
sort of like:
? (« where the space available to maneuver became like a very narrow hallway
along the lower- and left-facing walls.)
Somehow the dreamer escaped that room, only to find there were assassins
outside, and those had to be avoided as well. Sorry, but the dream was so
fraught with tension and "drama" that I've pretty much forgotten most of it,
sort of like "good riddance to bad vibes."
Around daybreak, I let the dog out for a few moments, then resumed my "morning
nap on the couch," where I soon had a *very clear* dream / astral experience,
nearly, *as if* a group of intellectually charged "astral entities" (aka "dream
bodies") were in a room, much like a small, college classroom (or advanced high
school something or other):
Also, as to which position the dreamer / narrative mind was "primarily
associated with" in the dream *may* be position of the headmaster of the class
(aka "the teacher") - regardless, this is about how it "unfurled," so to speak:
The instructor of the class, sort of like a lead philosopher / instructor, is
asking the class (as a whole):
"How does one add value to a person?"
The prepositional phrase of "to a person" seemed less important than the core
structure of the question, "How does
one add value...?" (to any living being or objective "thing.")
There was a clear moment of silence in the "classroom" as the students (those
people gathered there) pondered the question.
Someone (*possibly* the dreamer / narrative mind as well!) requested
clarification of the question, using only two words: "Define 'value'-"
The instructor replied directly (as if he'd been expecting the question) "That
which is greater than zero."
At this point, there was perhaps a *somewhat shorter* pause, and I (as the
person posting this dream) am unclear as to whether it was a "correct response"
*given,* or whether the instructor simply answered it for the class, yet
regardless, the answer was (is) accepted as a "correct" or "valid" answer-
"By giving it [or possibly 'him'] a name."
That is, to give a person (especially as a newborn) (or any *thing*) a "name,"
the individual (or "noun") is given "value." That value may *decrease* into a
negative range if the person becomes a "liar," whereas the individual reveals a
"positive value" when sharing / revealing that which is logically TRUE to
others, to the world. A value of "0" typically indicates that which was never
born.
Clarity? I suppose one could say that depends upon the perception of the reader
/ listener / viewer / receiver.